
Oh, and here's the part of this post that blogger dropped on my earlier attempt:
I think that first and foremost, a gift should be festive, and should be chosen with the aim of pleasing the recipient. I have mixed feelings about "practical" gifts. If chosen with love and thought, there's nothing better. On the other hand, if chosen with the not-too-well hidden message that it's time you did something about yourself or your home or your lawn -- FAIL.
Thus, a 3-pack of costly Chanel soaps in the recipient's favorite scent - WIN. A 3-pack of Dial or Lifebuoy, not so much, unless the recipient has recently been heard to complain that all the stores near her have stopped carrying this product which is her longtime favorite.
Another problematic gift is that which seeks to stimulate a new interest or skill in the recipient. I received a kit that contained a pair of knitting needles, some yarn, and a VERY CLEAR ILLUSTRATED INSTRUCTION BOOKLET when I was 10, and I loved it. The palette of 28 different frosted eye shadows that appeared, with diagrams, about 20 years later - not so much.
While I'm on the subject (sort of), my ears still ring from a 10th grade shopping trip with a girlfriend which resulted in us buying her 3-year-old brother the extra gigantic size carton of Lincoln Logs. My friend's mother made us both swear that we'd be responsible for picking up the pieces every time he went to play with it, and not letting him build anything near the stairs.
I have to mention the time someone who has begged me to let her remain unnamed got our grandmother an ant farm for Christmas.

And as for gifts from my late MIL, I've mentioned the ugly housedress on the blog often enough, but what about the giant string mop she thoughtfully bought for me from the school janitor?
Yes, I said late, but I have a VERY GOOD ALIBI.













